According to Mick Hurbis-Cherrier, 'If characters discuss the story they
are in, rather then just being in it, then the audience has no reason to become
emotionally involved in the unfolding tale. Believable and engaging characters
inhabit, act and react within the world of voice and the events that swirl around
them, (2012, pp.38).’ This remark from Hurbis-Cherrier, identifies with the
comments made by voice coach Lucy Cornell and 2UE journalists Murray Olds and
Murray Wilton during their 2UE radio program. Julia Gillard’s voice and her
delivery of speech do not indulge nor involve the audience. It often comes
across as just a sound and the content and value of the speech is lost. I some
what agree with the comments made by the 2UE hosts and voice coach, in the
sense that Julia Gillard has “a mind of a barrister and a voice of a bricky
(2UE, n.d).” She is an intelligent woman probably with a lot of important
remarks to make. However her voice, referred to as a ‘bogan’ voice, does not allow
these remarks to be effectively heard. Her unusual voice that according to Lucy
Cornell “lacks warmth and depth (2UE, n.d),” is often difficult to listen to.
Voice coach Lucy Cornell asked, “If her voice where more like Cate Blanchett’s
voice would it be more appealing (2UE, n.d)?” I think the answer to this, would
be yes. Cate Blanchett’s voice is warm and intriguing. It is easy and soothing
to listen to. Lucy Cornell also said that people like to listen to others “Opening
and revealing that human part of them selves, and daring to be that brave and
revealing and therefore it becomes inspirational (2UE, n.d).” Julia Gillard
does not do this and her speeches often sound generic and repetitive.
Reference:
Hurbis-Cherrier, M, 2012, Voice and Vision, second edition, ELSEVIER,
Sydney.
Olds M, Wilton M, n.d, Julia Gillard’s Voice, viewed 24
February 2014, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEybGzg1Nxs
No comments:
Post a Comment